Image signature

[Unaided]

Why I can upload image to signature, but I don't have permission to set [IMG] and HTML in signature?

[Adrian Lazar]

Oh please don't allow html or images in signature!
Keep it clean, i don't want to see everywhere colorful banners or who know what other "bling bling" signature :nono:

[Unaided]

Jajaja...

A image signature don't have why dirty.. if a image signature is not clean is a problem of the member. Excessive or flashy image I don't want either. But and elegance or sutil image is pretty.

You think this theme is clean?? When least I to seem of don't be a official site, with this colors, the header image with wood-train-box, and their grafitti stamp... or background image like of adolescent student folder.

[giant551]

I agree Adrian I also don't want to see those huge photoshopped sigs either.

Its not the fact that the content is offensive Unaided i think Adrian meant clean as in keeping the threads uncluttered with huge signature pictures. You might not do that, but you can bet your bottom dollar others will. Just go and have a look over a SM-cars for example.

Also Softimage have made a huge leap in the right direction in my opinion by creating this site for us users so i think i can live with the colours or style of the site. That will mature and develop as time goes on. What is importent is that we as users feedback in a constructive way to softimage to improve there products and this site. Comments like "background image like of adolescent student folder" doesn't do that i think.

lets keep it friendly eh?

cheers

Paul

[Unaided]

I agree Adrian I also don't want to see those huge photoshopped sigs either.

Exists a size limit for upload image.

[Zac-Donald]

I think a very small image could work (like 100 by 500)
But I could take it or leave it.

[JDex]

Gonna have to vote no... they clutter up the content on the page unnecessarily, and I think the content is why we all visit.

[ThE_JacO]

Image signatures are tacky and waste bandwidth for no reason at all. I'm glad we don't allow them and will make sure I do everything I can so that we keep not allowing such a useless waste of bandwidth :)

[Leo]

In my book, that's a definite NO! Then again, it's only my humble, humble book...

[EdHarriss]

I would also like to say "no to image in signatures!"
I want to read posts, not be distracted by animated gifs and such.

If I want to be distracted, I"ll head over to youtube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8XmhNF0Vkw). To watch something like this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8XmhNF0Vkw).

[hank freid plans]

In my opinion, Image signatuer don't allow in html and or images in signature!